-
-
Recent Posts
- Driving Under Suspension Cases Can Have Very Serious Collateral Consequences
- Proof of Prior OVI When Prior an Element Under RC 4511.19(A)(2)
- Notes on Chemical Test Evidence In OVI Cases
- Car Searches Arising Out of Traffic Stops and the Voluntariness of Consent to Search
- New Speedy Trial Clock for New Charges Based on Lab Results
Categories
Archives
Month: August 2020
What Happened to BMV Random Selection Suspension?
The BMV used to mail out random letters to Ohio drivers requiring them to provide current proof of financial responsibility. If the driver failed to respond or did not have proof of financial responsibility the first time, his license was suspended until he filed an SR-22 certificate and paid a $150.00 reinstatement fee. By a […]
<span class="entry-utility-prep entry-utility-prep-cat-links">Posted in</span> License Reinstatement
Comments Off on What Happened to BMV Random Selection Suspension?
The Statutory Definition of “Operate” Applies to Operating Under the Influence and Operating Under a License Suspension
The First District Court of Appeals recently established that the same statutory definition of “operate” applies to both OVI and DUS. R.C. Title 45 governs motor vehicles. The entire title contains only one definition of the word “operate”. That definition is found in R.C. 4511.01 (HHH). According to the introductory language to the definitions in […]
<span class="entry-utility-prep entry-utility-prep-cat-links">Posted in</span> OVI
Comments Off on The Statutory Definition of “Operate” Applies to Operating Under the Influence and Operating Under a License Suspension